Publish for the decision, not a word count
A page should explain a real choice or help a reader complete a task. We favor clear conditions, useful comparisons and concrete limitations over repeated marketing lists or an arbitrary length.
Advice should remain understandable when read on its own. Important caveats belong next to the claim they qualify, including whether an observation used a guest session, a paid plan or only public documentation.
Attribute claims and keep evidence boundaries visible
Official documentation, direct observation and third-party reporting are different sources. We identify the basis of material claims and do not present a provider’s statement as our own test result.
First-person accounts require a real observation. We do not manufacture product use, specialist credentials, independent audits or measured results. If a claim cannot be supported, it should be removed, narrowed or marked unresolved.
Explain commercial relationships without inventing independence
Some links earn referral commissions, and homepage lists may include owner-selected featured commercial positions. Those placements do not establish tested performance or remove a product’s documented drawbacks.
Submitting a tool does not guarantee a listing, a review or a favorable assessment. A product owner can send relevant factual corrections, but a commercial relationship does not supply evidence for an unsupported claim.
AI assistance is part of the workflow, not evidence
We use AI to assist with research organization, drafting, editing and some localization. That assistance does not demonstrate hands-on experience, factual accuracy or native-speaker review.
The final page still needs relevant sources, sensible reasoning and honest limits. Stored translations are not all publicly available. We do not claim that a language was independently edited by a native speaker unless that work took place.
Make corrections useful and dates meaningful
Report an error with the affected URL, the exact statement, what should change and a source or reproducible explanation. For a pricing issue, include the plan, currency and date you saw it.
Substantive corrections may change the advice, limitations or update date. A newer publication date is not evidence of a new test. We preserve genuine observation dates and distinguish a source review from a retest.